Performance Analysis of Emergency Power Supply
Comparison of emergency power equipment
Diesel generator solar power system
1KW set cost = 300,000 RMB 1KW of
Life:10 years and 7 ~ 20 years
Sunlight diesel fuel - renewable and clean energy (free)
Plus ATS system operation, when power don’t work; but which should be tested monthly operating normally on officers. It also can be used in emergency and learn the operating conditions at any time, operators do not need to use additional
Set of space equipment, pipe, insulation, tank interior space utilization need balconies, roof, wall space
Shortcomings are noise, air pollution, oil transportation, storage risk, and maintenance and operation costs are high at night without power (It can use battery power supply design, freight 0.2% in Victoria)
Total generation degrees
(1kW of dollars) (in test operation on power failure + hours) × 10 years = (20 min × 6 times 15 minutes × 12 month) × 10 years = 5 hours × 1KW of × 10 years = 50kWh daily generation × 365 degrees days × 20 years = 3 hours × 365days × × 1KW 20 years = 21900kWh (degrees)
The cost of 20,000RMB per kWh ÷ 50kWh = 400 RMB /Day ÷ 21900kWh 13.7 RMB/Degree
Risk Analysis
In addition, it recommends that use diverse of energy resources to share the risk of power shortages.
Type of risk analysis of energy
High risk in mains cities when power failure.
Electricity + generator diesel generator high risk when it failure.
City diesel generators + electric + solar power generation system to play three advantages: complementary, failure probability is small,and the lowest risk.
Do you know?
Solar power generation systems’ advantanges are more than diesel generation system, such as the reduction of environmental pollution, inadequate to solve the peak power, shielding direct sunlight (On the one hand reducing the thermal effect of buildings, known as passive energy-saving; on the other hand converting sunlight into electricity, the supply of building self-energy, also known as the active energy) and many other advantages.
Initial implementation costs are high, but for using in disaster or emergency auxiliary power on, the play's effectiveness can be higher than the economic cost considerations. Therefore, the overall efficiency, the solar power generation system is better choice.
